|CrossRef Text and Data Mining|
|Result of CrossRef Text and Data Mining Search is the related articles with entitled article. If you click link1 or link2 you will be able to reach the full text site of selected articles; however, some links do not show the full text immediately at now. If you click CrossRef Text and Data Mining Download icon, you will be able to get whole list of articles from literature included in CrossRef Text and Data Mining.|
|Can Narrow Band Chirp Stimulus Shake the Throne of 500 Hz Tone Burst Stimulus for Cervical Vestibular Myogenic Potentials?|
|F Ceyda Akin Ocal, Ceren Karacayli, Volkan Kenan Coban, Bulent Satar|
J Audiol Otol. 2021;25(2):98-103. Published online January 19, 2021
Can Narrow Band Chirp Stimulus Shake the Throne of 500 Hz Tone Burst Stimulus for Cervical Vestibular Myogenic Potentials?
Differences in bone conduction ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials to 500 Hz narrow band chirp stimulus and 500 Hz tone burst
Optimizing stimulus repetition rate for recording ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential elicited by air-conduction tone bursts of 500 Hz
Characterizing the impact of advancing age on 500 Hz tone-burst evoked ocular–vestibular evoked myogenic potentials
Letter to the Editor regarding “Comparison of cervical and ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential responses between tone burst versus chirp stimulation” by Aydin et al.
Cervical and Ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials Are Sensitive to Stimulus Phase
Ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials: Skull taps can cause a stimulus direction dependent double-peak
P1.3 Ocular and cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials to 500 Hz Fz bone conducted vibration in semicircular canal dehiscence
Comparison of cervical and ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential responses between tone burst versus chirp stimulation
Response: Earlier Peak Latencies May not Fully Reflect the Robustness of Cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential to CE-Chirp Stimulus