1. Humes LE. Speech understanding in the elderly. J Am Acad Audiol 1996;7:161–167. PMID:
8780988.
2. Gordon-Salant S. Hearing loss and aging: new research findings and clinical implications. J Rehabil Res Dev 2005;42(4 Suppl 2):9–24. PMID:
16470462.
3. Dubno JR, Dirks DD, Morgan DE. Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1984;76:87–96. PMID:
6747116.
4. van Rooij JC, Plomp R, Orlebeke JF. Auditive and cognitive factors in speech perception by elderly listeners. I: Development of test battery. J Acoust Soc Am 1989;86:1294–1309. PMID:
2808905.
5. Divenyi PL, Stark PB, Haupt KM. Decline of speech understanding and auditory thresholds in the elderly. J Acoust Soc Am 2005;118:1089–1100. PMID:
16158663.
6. Plomp R. Auditory handicap of hearing impairment and the limited benefit of hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am 1978;63:533–549. PMID:
670550.
7. Pichora-Fuller MK. Cognitive aging and auditory information processing. Int J Audiol 2003;42(Suppl 2):2S26–2S32. PMID:
12918626.
8. Gelfand SA, Piper N, Silman S. Consonant recognition in quiet and in noise with aging among normal hearing listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 1986;80:1589–1598. PMID:
3794064.
9. Working Group on Speech Understanding and Aging. Committee on Hearing, Bioacoustics, and Biomechanics, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council. Speech understanding and aging. J Acoust Soc Am 1988;83:859–895. PMID:
3281988.
10. Goŕdon-Salant S, Fitzgibbons PJ. Temporal factors and speech recognition performance in young and elderly listeners. J Speech Hear Res 1993;36:1276–1285. PMID:
8114494.
11. Snell KB. Age-related changes in temporal gap detection. J Acoust Soc Am 1997;101:2214–2220. PMID:
9104023.
12. Dorman MF, Marton K, Hannley MT, Lindholm JM. Phonetic identification by elderly normal and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 1985;77:664–670. PMID:
3973237.
13. Feng Y, Yin S, Kiefte M, Wang J. Temporal resolution in regions of normal hearing and speech perception in noise for adults with sloping high-frequency hearing loss. Ear Hear 2010;31:115–125. PMID:
19816181.
14. Salthouse TA. The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychol Rev 1996;103:403–428. PMID:
8759042.
15. Gordon-Salant S, Fitzgibbons PJ. Selected cognitive factors and speech recognition performance among young and elderly listeners. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1997;40:423–431. PMID:
9130210.
16. Rabbitt P. An age-decrement in the ability to ignore irrelevant information. J Gerontol 1965;20:233–238. PMID:
14284802.
17. Humes LE, Floyd SS. Measures of working memory, sequence learning, and speech recognition in the elderly. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2005;48:224–235. PMID:
15938066.
18. Mukari SZ, Umat C, Othman NI. Effects of age and working memory capacity on pitch pattern sequence test and dichotic listening. Audiol Neurootol 2010;15:303–310. PMID:
20150728.
19. Passow S, Westerhausen R, Wartenburger I, Hugdahl K, Heekeren HR, Lindenberger U, et al. Human aging compromises attentional control of auditory perception. Psychol Aging 2012;27:99–105. PMID:
21988156.
20. Pichora-Fuller MK, Schneider BA, Daneman M. How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1995;97:593–608. PMID:
7860836.
21. Wong PC, Jin JX, Gunasekera GM, Abel R, Lee ER, Dhar S. Aging and cortical mechanisms of speech perception in noise. Neuropsychologia 2009;47:693–703. PMID:
19124032.
22. Bouma A, Gootjes L. Effects of attention on dichotic listening in elderly and patients with dementia of the Alzheimer type. Brain Cogn 2011;76:286–293. PMID:
21429649.
23. Quar TK, Mukari SZ, Abdul Wahab NA, Abdul Razak R, Omar M, Maamor N. The Malay hearing in noise test. Int J Audiol 2008;47:379–380. PMID:
18569117.
24. Frisina DR, Frisina RD. Speech recognition in noise and presbycusis: relations to possible neural mechanisms. Hear Res 1997;106:95–104. PMID:
9112109.
25. Divenyi PL, Haupt KM. Audiological correlates of speech understanding deficits in elderly listeners with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. I. Age and lateral asymmetry effects. Ear Hear 1997;18:42–61. PMID:
9058037.
26. McCoy C, Butler M, Broekhoff J. Effects of age and sex on dichotic listening: the SSW test. J Aud Res 1977;17:263–268. PMID:
617814.
27. Soli SD, Wong LL. Assessment of speech intelligibility in noise with the Hearing in Noise Test. Int J Audiol 2008;47:356–361. PMID:
18569108.
28. Jerger J, Chmiel R, Allen J, Wilson A. Effects of age and gender on dichotic sentence identification. Ear Hear 1994;15:274–286. PMID:
7958527.
29. Glyde H, Hickson L, Cameron S, Dillon H. Problems hearing in noise in older adults: a review of spatial processing disorder. Trends Amplif 2011;15:116–126. PMID:
22072599.
30. Dubno JR, Ahlstrom JB, Horwitz AR. Spectral contributions to the benefit from spatial separation of speech and noise. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2002;45:1297–1310. PMID:
12546495.
31. Glyde H, Cameron S, Dillon H, Hickson L, Seeto M. The effects of hearing impairment and aging on spatial processing. Ear Hear 2013;34:15–28. PMID:
22941406.
32. Kimura D. Functional asymmetry of the brain in dichotic listening. Cortex 1967;3:163–178.
33. Knecht S, Dräger B, Deppe M, Bobe L, Lohmann H, Flöel A, et al. Handedness and hemispheric language dominance in healthy humans. Brain 2000;123 Pt 12:2512–2518. PMID:
11099452.
34. Greenwald RR, Jerger J. Aging affects hemispheric asymmetry on a competing speech task. J Am Acad Audiol 2001;12:167–173. PMID:
11332516.
35. de Fockert JW. Keeping priorities: the role of working memory and selective attention in cognitive aging. Sci Aging Knowledge Environ 2005;2005:pe34PMID:
16267341.