1. Holt LL, Lotto AJ, Kluender KR. Neighboring spectral content influences vowel identification. J Acoust Soc Am 2000;108:710–22.
2. Lindblom BE, Studdert-Kennedy M. On the role of formant transitions in vowel recognition. J Acoust Soc Am 1967;42:830–43.
3. Nearey TM. Static, dynamic, and relational properties in vowel perception. J Acoust Soc Am 1989;85:2088–113.
4. Holt LL. Auditory constraints on speech perception: an examination of spectral contrast [dissertation] Madison(WI): University of Wisconsin-Madison;1999.
5. Mann VA, Repp BH. Influence of preceding fricative on stop consonant perception. J Acoust Soc Am 1981;69:548–58.
6. Fowler CA. Production and perception of coarticulation among stressed and unstressed vowels. J Speech Hear Res 1981;24:127–39.
7. Liberman AM, Delattre P, Cooper FS. The role of selected stimulus-variables in the perception of the unvoiced stop consonants. Am J Psychol 1952;65:497–516.
8. Kewley-Port D. Measurement of formant transitions in naturally produced stop consonant-vowel syllables. J Acoust Soc Am 1982;72:379–89.
9. Mann V, Soli SD. Perceptual order and the effect of vocalic context on fricative perception. Percept Psychophys 1991;49:399–411.
10. Mann VA, Repp BH. Influence of vocalic context on perception of the zh to ʃ distinction. Percept Psychophys 1980;28:213–28.
11. Whalen DH. Effects of vocalic formant transitions and vowel quality on the English [s]-[ŝ] boundary. J Acoust Soc Am 1981;69:275–82.
12. Cooper WE. Contingent feature analysis in speech perception. Percept Psychophys 1974;16:201–4.
13. Miller JL, Eimas PD. Studies on the selective tuning of feature detectors for speech. J Phon 1976;4:119–27.
14. Dubno JR, Levitt H. Predicting consonant confusions from acoustic analysis. J Acoust Soc Am 1981;69:249–61.
15. Singh S, Black JW. Study of twenty-six intervocalic consonants as spoken and recognized by four language groups. J Acoust Soc Am 1966;39:372–87.
16. Wang MD, Bilger RC. Consonant confusions in noise: a study of perceptual features. J Acoust Soc Am 1973;54:1248–66.
17. Woods DL, Yund EW, Herron TJ, Ua Cruadhlaoich MA. Consonant identification in consonant-vowel-consonant syllables in speech-spectrum noise. J Acoust Soc Am 2010;127:1609–23.
18. Redford MA, Diehl RL. The relative perceptual distinctiveness of initial and final consonants in CVC syllables. J Acoust Soc Am 1999;106(3 Pt 1):1555–65.
20. Green KP, Kuhl PK, Meltzoff AN. Factors affecting the integration of auditory and visual information in speech: the effect of vowel environment. J Acoust Soc Am 1988;84:S155
21. Burnham D. Language specificity in the development of auditoryvisual speech perception. In: Campbell R, Dodd B, Burnham D. editors. Hearing eye II: advances in the psychology of speechreading and auditory-visual speech. Hove: Psychology Press Ltd;1998. p.27–60.
22. Shigeno S. Influence of vowel context on the audio-visual speech perception of voiced stop consonants. Jpn Psychol Res 2000;42:155–67.
23. Manuel SY, Krakow RA. Universal and language particular aspects of vowel-to-vowel coarticulation. Haskin Lab Status Reports Speech Res 1984;SR-77/78:69–78.
24. Magen H. Vowel-to-vowel coarticulation in English and Japanese. J Acoust Soc Am 1984;75:S41
25. Manuel SY. The role of contrast in limiting vowel-to-vowel coarticulation in different languages. J Acoust Soc Am 1990;88:1286–98.
26. Boyce SE. Coarticulatory organization for lip rounding in Turkish and English. J Acoust Soc Am 1990;88:2584–95.
27. Kalaiah MK, Thomas D, Bhat JS, Ranjan R. Perception of consonants in speech-shaped noise among young and middle-aged adults. J Int Adv Otol 2016;12:184–8.
29. Hazan V, Markham D. Acoustic-phonetic correlates of talker intelligibility for adults and children. J Acoust Soc Am 2004;116:3108–18.
30. Miller GA, Nicely PE. An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. J Acoust Soc Am 1955;27:338–52.
31. Phatak SA, Allen JB. Consonant and vowel confusions in speech-weighted noise. J Acoust Soc Am 2007;121:2312–26.
32. Wagner A, Ernestus M. Identification of phonemes: differences between phoneme classes and the effect of class size. Phonetica 2008;65:106–27.