Speech Recognition in Real-Life Background Noise by Young and Middle-Aged Adults with Normal Hearing

Article information

J Audiol Otol. 2025;29(2):158-158

Publication date (electronic) : 2025 April 18

doi : https://doi.org/10.7874/jao.2015.19.1.39.e1

Ji Young Lee ¹^,²^,³, Jin Tae Lee ¹, Hye Jeong Heo ¹, Chul-Hee Choi ¹^,²^,³, Seong Hee Choi ¹^,²^,³, Kyungjae Lee ¹^,²^,³

¹Department of Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology, Catholic University of Daegu, Gyeongsan, Korea

²Research Institute of Biomimetic Sensory Control, Catholic University of Daegu, Gyeongsan, Korea

³Catholic Hearing Voice Speech Center, Catholic University of Daegu, Gyeongsan, Korea

https://doi.org/10.7874/jao.2015.19.1.39

Journal of Audiology & Otology 2015;19(1):39-44.

In the published article above, an error has been identified in the Results section of the Abstract.

On page 39, the second result was originally published as:

“2) at the SNR of -5 dB, speech recognition was greater in subway noise than vacuum noise and in vacuum noise than MTB while at the SNRs of 0 and 5 dB, it was greater in subway noise than both vacuum noise and MTB and there was no difference between vacuum noise and MTB,”

This should be corrected to:

“2) at the SNR of 5 dB, speech recognition was greater in subway noise than in MTB, and greater in MTB than in vacuum noise, while at the SNRs of 0 and -5 dB, it was greater in subway noise than both vacuum noise and MTB and there was no difference between vacuum noise and MTB,”

The change is marked with underline.

We apologize for any inconvenience this oversight may have caused.

Article information Continued

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.